Jagger_Algo_Update_Element-two_46578 < Sandbox

This is the second part of the Google Jagger update discussion. The 1st part of this article discussed the overview of how and why Google wants to update its internet site ranking algorithms periodically. This article shall discuss the particular places the Jagger update has altered in the Google algorithm.

Sources at Google claim that the modifications we see are element of three-phase update (Jagger1, Jagger2 & Jagger3). At the time of writing this report, we are in the completion stage of Jagger2 update. The Jagger3 update is anticipated to be rolled out more than the next couple of weeks.

Jagger Update 1

The Jagger 1 update pre-shocks really began with a string of back-link updates that started in September 2005 and continued into middle of October 2005. This refreshing best mary morrissey page

website has various witty aids for how to do it. This rousing morrissey

essay has assorted wonderful suggestions for the meaning behind this hypothesis. In mid October, Google updated its PageRank database for public view. Normally updated as soon as a quarter, the PR update always creates a stir. While most Seo experts heavily play-down the value of PR in ranking, the legacy of its value is so deep-rooted in the minds of most webmasters, that it is hard to shake it off as an insignificant ranking parameter.

Jagger Update 2

It is believed that the Jagger 2 update is now comprehensive and replicated to all the information centers of Google. However, you might nonetheless notice some fluctuations in the rankings as issues stabilize for every single update. We are now at the threshold of the 3rd phase of the Jagger update, which is anticipated to initiate sometime in the second week of November 2005.

From what we have studied so far, Google has re-engineered a number of elements of its algorithm. Amongst other elements we will know as issues roll out, we think it has altered the influence of the following:-

1. Value of incoming links

2. Value of anchor text in incoming links

3. Content material on web page of incoming hyperlinks

4. Keyword repetitions in anchor text

five. If you have an opinion about politics, you will probably fancy to explore about this month

. Dig up further on mary morrissey page

by visiting our interesting article directory. Age of the incoming hyperlinks

six. Nature of websites linking to you

7. Directory links

eight. Speed and volume of incoming hyperlinks produced

9. Value of reciprocal hyperlinks

10. Influence of outbound hyperlinks / hyperlinks web page on your website

11. Sandbox impact / age of your internet site, domain registration date

12. Size of your site's content

13. Addition and frequency of fresh content material update

14. Canonical / sub domains, sub-sub domains

15. Numerous domains on very same IP numbers

16. Duplicate content material on identical internet site or on numerous domains

17. Over-optimization, excessive text markup

18. Irrational use of CSS

We are studying numerous aspects of the Jagger algo update and are closely monitoring the impact of modifications in every of the above talked about parameters and numerous more not pointed out right here. We shall be discussing the influence of each and every of these aspects in the next parts of this article, which are probably to be written when the Jagger3 update and our study of it is complete.

In the meanwhile, we'd like to give out a word of caution If you have suffered drop in your website rankings, do not do any drastic adjustments on your internet site until the Jagger3 update is fully implemented and stabilized. There is a delicate balance and inter-dependence of all these parameters that can bring back your ranks when the Jagger3 update is completed.

Revision: r1 - 2014-03-17 - 02:36:34 - ElveRa775

	Sandbox > Jagger_Algo_Update_Element-two_46578	Daya Bay webs: Public \| 中文 \| Internal \| *Help*
			Log In or Register