Most precise measurement of reactor antineutrino spectrum reveals intriguing surprise
Daya Bay detects discrepancies with theoretical predictions, provides
important reference data for future reactor neutrino experiments
Members of the International Daya Bay Collaboration, who track the
production and flavor-shifting behavior of electron antineutrinos
generated at a nuclear power complex in China, have obtained the most
precise measurement of these subatomic particles’ energy spectrum ever
recorded. The data generated from the world’s largest sample of reactor
antineutrinos indicate two intriguing discrepancies with theoretical
predictions and provide an important measurement that will shape future
reactor neutrino experiments. The results have been published in the
journal Physical Review Letters.
Studying the behavior of elusive neutrinos holds the potential to unlock
many secrets of physics, including details about the history, makeup, and
fate of our universe. Neutrinos were among the most abundant particles at
the time of the Big Bang, and are still generated abundantly today in the
nuclear reactions that power stars and in collisions of cosmic rays with
Earth’s atmosphere.
They are also emitted as a by-product of power generation in man-made
nuclear reactors, giving scientists a powerful way to study them on Earth
in a controlled manner. In fact, the study of particles emitted by
reactors led to the first detection of neutrinos in the 1950s, a finding
once considered impossible due to the extreme inert nature of these
particles, which were then only predicted. Since that time reactor
experiments, including Daya Bay, have played a crucial role in uncovering
the secrets of neutrino oscillation—their tendency to switch among three
known flavors: electron, muon, and tau—and other important neutrino
properties.
A crucial factor for many of these experiments is knowing how many
antineutrinos are emitted in total in these nuclear reactions (the flux),
and how many are being produced at particular energies (the energy
distribution, or spectrum). In early studies, scientists relied on
calculations or other indirect means, such as electron spectrum
measurements made on reactor fuels, to estimate these numbers, based on
their understanding of the complex fission processes in the reactor core.
These methods have rather strong dependence on theoretical models.
The Daya Bay Collaboration now provides the most precise model-independent
measurement of the energy spectrum of these elusive particles, and a new
measurement of total antineutrino flux. The data were gathered by
analyzing more than 300,000 reactor antineutrinos collected over the
course of 217 days. The most challenging part of this work was to
accurately calibrate the energy response of the detectors. Through
dedicated calibration and analysis effort, Daya Bay was able to measure
the neutrino energy to an unprecedented precision, better than 1 percent,
over a broad energy range of the reactor antineutrinos.
The measured reactor antineutrino spectrum shows a surprising feature: an
excess of antineutrinos at an energy of around 5 million electron volts
(MeV) compared with theoretical expectations. This represents a deviation
of about 10 percent between the experimental measurement and calculations
based on the theoretical models—well beyond the uncertainties—leading to a
discrepancy of up to four standard deviations. ‘This unexpected
disagreement between our observation and predictions strongly suggested
that the current calculations would need some refinement,” commented
Kam-Biu Luk of the University of California at Berkeley and DOE’s Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory, the co-spokesperson of the Daya Bay
Collaboration. Two other experiments have shown a similar excess at this
energy, though with less precision than the new Daya Bay result.
Such deviation shows the importance of the direct measurement of the
reactor antineutrino spectrum, particularly for experiments that use the
spectrum to measure neutrino oscillations, and may indicate the need to
revisit the models underlying the calculations. “We expect that the
spectrum measured by Daya Bay will improve with more data and better
understanding of the detector response. These improved measurements will
be essential for next-generation reactor neutrino experiments such as
JUNO,” said Jun Cao of the Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) in
China, the co-spokesperson of Daya Bay and the deputy spokesperson of
JUNO, an experiment being built 200 kilometers away from Daya Bay.
Daya Bay’s measurement of antineutrino flux—the total number of
antineutrinos emitted across the entire energy range—indicates that the
reactors are producing 6 percent fewer antineutrinos overall when compared
to some of the model-based predictions. This result is consistent with
past measurements. This observed deficit has been named the “Reactor
Antineutrino Anomaly.” This disagreement could arise from the imperfection
of the models. Or, more intriguingly, it could be the result of an
oscillation involving a new kind of neutrino, the so-called sterile
neutrino—postulated by some theories but yet to be detected. Whether the
anomaly exists is still an open question.
Background on Daya Bay
The Daya Bay nuclear power complex is located on the southern coast of
China, 55 kilometers northeast of Hong Kong. It consists of three nuclear
power plants, each with two reactor cores. All six cores are pressurized
water reactors with similar design, and each can generate up to 2.9
gigawatt thermal power. Every second, the six reactors emit 3,500 billion
billon electron antineutrinos. For this measurement, the Daya Bay
experiment used six detectors located at 360 meters to 1.9 kilometers from
the reactors. Each detector contains 20 tons of gadolinium-doped liquid
scintillator to catch the reactor antineutrinos.
Media contacts
Jun Cao, co-spokesperson, IHEP, +86-10-88235808, caoj@ihep.ac.cn
Kam-Biu Luk, co-spokesperson, UC Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory, 510-642-8162, 510-486-7054, k_luk@berkeley.edu
For more information, visit http://dayabay.ihep.ac.cn/
And these Related Links
Scientific paper:
http://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061801